Chapter 6: A Summary of Current Ecosystem Conditions

 

"...a society and its biophysical environment are interactive, interadaptive, and interdependent in a single biosocial system of constant mutual adjustment."

R.W. Behan, 1995

 

This chapter documents the current status of selected ecosystem indicators for forests and woodlands of the Southwest. The integration and interpretation of these indicators from the conditions described in chapters 3 to 5 provide both a summary for specific biotic communities and a statement of professional expertise and judgment of the team. Ecosystem conditions in this chapter are defined by the following questions:

 

  1. Is adequate provision made for the conservation of biological diversity? The maintenance of biodiversity includes, at a broad scale, maintaining the composition and arrangement of species and ecosystems across the landscape and, at a lower level of organization, maintaining the diversity of gene pools within a species. Diversity is important in forested ecosystems because a loss of species is associated with an increased potential for species extinction or genetic loss of species with known or unforeseen ecological or societal value. Also, diverse ecosystems may be less susceptible to devastation by disturbance events.
  2. Is ecosystem integrity and resilience maintained in the long term? These are respectively defined as the ability of the ecosystem: (a) to maintain vital ecological processes, such as energy flows, nutrient cycling, hydrologic cycling, soil development, plant community succession, animal population movements (i.e., migration), and unimpaired flow of genetic material at rates within the range of historic variability and (b) to recover biotic integrity following disturbance.
  3. Are human needs for ecosystem resource use and landscape occupancy being adequately accommodated?

 

WOODLANDS

 

Biological Diversity

 

Integrity and Resilience

 

Human Needs and Uses

 

PONDEROSA PINE

 

Biological Diversity

 

Integrity and Resilience

 

Human Needs and Uses

 

MIXED CONIFER

 

Biological Diversity

 

Integrity and Resilience

 

Human Needs and Uses

 

SPRUCE–FIR

 

Biological Diversity, Integrity, and Resilience

 

Human Needs and Uses

 

ASPEN

 

Biological Diversity

 

Integrity and Resilience

 

Human Needs and Uses

 

MONTANE RIPARIAN WETLANDS

 

Biological Diversity

 

Integrity and Resilience

 

Human Needs and Uses

 

FLOODPLAIN–PLAINS RIPARIAN WETLANDS

 

Biological Diversity

 

Integrity and Resilience

 

Human Needs and Uses

 

CONCLUSION

The history of human occupation in the Southwest has resulted in many changes that are pervasive across all provinces. Many forest health issues are problems at scale levels below the province level. However, at a broad analysis resolution, we can address the following questions on the status of forest ecosystems:

Is Adequate Provision Being Made for the Conservation of Biological Diversity?

Species numbers for many species that are intensively managed appear to be stable or even increasing. However, the population dynamics of many less intensively managed species are unknown; others are considered to be on the decline. Habitat fragmentation of the landscape appears to have increasingly isolated many plant and animal populations to the degree that their long-term viability is in question. As intensive human use of ecosystem resources increases with a corresponding rise in our population, the survival of these species will remain in doubt.

Is Ecosystem Integrity and Resilience Being Maintained in the Long Term?

Generally, yes. However, in certain ecosystems such as deciduous riparian forests along major rivers, integrity and resilience has declined to a degree that seriously jeopardizes ecosystem structure and function. Similar degradation has occurred in coniferous woodlands (pinyon–juniper), where loss of understory plant cover has greatly accelerated soil erosion rates beyond historical levels. In coniferous forests (i.e., ponderosa pine), stand structure has changed to conditions that place these forests increasingly at risk of loss from catastrophic (stand replacement) fires than in past time periods.

Are Human Needs for Ecosystem Resource Use and Landscape Occupancy Being Adequately Accommodated?

Human population has been growing and human interest in and demands upon ecosystem resources have expanded and caused a geometric rise in pressure upon the landscape. Increased human occupancy of the land has resulted in greater numbers of people being adversely impacted by disasters such as fires and floods. Increasing human presence upon and use of the land by a wide variety of groups often holding contrasting views and values concerning the land have resulted in a heightened degree of conflict. This is especially true between groups who favor traditional utilitarian uses of the land and those for which preservation and protection are highest priorities. Traditional extractive uses of land resources have declined, resulting in the closing of forest-based industries. American Indian tribes are speaking out more forcefully on traditional cultural and religious concerns. The clash of cultures, whether rural versus urban or utilitarian versus protection, appears driven by our inability to resolve issues related to balancing the needs and desires of humans with the biological needs of nonhuman organisms in the ecosystem. Thus, it seems that human needs are inadequately accommodated.

Did you reach this page out of context? Go to the home page to start at the beginning.